Based on the book series by Edo van Belkom, Wolf Pack follows a teenage boy and girl whose lives are changed forever when a California wildfire awakens a terrifying supernatural creature and drives it to attack a highway traffic jam beneath the burning hills. Wounded in the chaos, the boy and girl are inexplicably drawn to each other and to two other teenagers who were adopted sixteen years earlier by a park ranger after another mysterious wildfire. As the full moon rises, all four teens come together to unravel the secret that connects them - the bite and blood of a werewolf.
well what more was there to say? The story was completed with every thing explained. SMG's talent was under used though, but she has been away for some time,. I wonder whether also true for the hit Netflix show "Wednesday"
by Miko791 posted 1 year ago
Wolf Pack: Cancelled; Paramount+ Not Making Second Season of Sarah Michelle Gellar Series
Shame, not a top series but I found it nice to watch
by merc posted 2 years ago
The mistake the show did make was to underplay the real malevolence that SMG really was about, that human life was worth no more than the moose to a pack of wolves. Right to the end it was a comfy teen show rather than a horror story
by mrverene posted 2 years ago
sounds right. i'd not be surprised if you get a season 2 as paramount seems to be a bit less hair trigger than other services.
by merc posted 2 years ago
well SMG in the end is a nasty bit of work behind a pretty face who is responsible for every thing
by merc posted 2 years ago
well eps 8 the finale was a surprise and explained it all. oh by the way the straight handshake did have a meaning. In the end a nice little series that left us puzzling right until the end, with a few misdirections on the way. I doubt it will be back for a season 2 , though there are loose ends to develop should they decide to do so.
by merc posted 2 years ago
so 62 people in this group not just me is watching it , good to know
Basically no ratings reflect objective reality, not here, not IMDb (where they are even weighted, which is a synonym for biased), Rotten Tomatoes reviewers ratings are a complete, utter bullshit (same as 100% useless information is what some winery owner thinks about 6 eur wine you purchase in a grocery store) etc. Realistically can just calculate some score, but for that also to be even close to objective, you need a huge amount of input data and a lot of math. Since such data sometimes has just IMDb and they don't share it, all you can do is to check top and worst reviews, see who and why are rating high/low and do an educated guess.
by mrverene posted 2 years ago
I stopped trying to figure out the mysteries of the ratings here when I saw the Flash is still over 4 but https://next-episode.net/a-spy-among-friends is 2.86. But yes, the ratings here are just for this site. I personally didn't rate this one since I don't rate shows I drop.
by merc posted 2 years ago
a question about the ratings here - is it just people in this group or outisde as it is getting 4.4 out of 5 for 62 ratings, which seems respectable. The only issue I have is there is too much gay-sex and hetero-sex I bet we will soon were-sex also. eps 7 gave it all away.. some nice human->were transformations
Follow
Shame, not a top series but I found it nice to watch
Basically no ratings reflect objective reality, not here, not IMDb (where they are even weighted, which is a synonym for biased), Rotten Tomatoes reviewers ratings are a complete, utter bullshit (same as 100% useless information is what some winery owner thinks about 6 eur wine you purchase in a grocery store) etc. Realistically can just calculate some score, but for that also to be even close to objective, you need a huge amount of input data and a lot of math. Since such data sometimes has just IMDb and they don't share it, all you can do is to check top and worst reviews, see who and why are rating high/low and do an educated guess.