Next Episode Mobile App
The best
TV tracker on mobile!
Get it now free for:
iPhone or Android

Doctor Who (2024)
+ add to watchlist

Doctor Who (2024)

The Doctor and friends travel from the dawn of human history to distant alien worlds. And everywhere they go, they find adventure, terror, fun, chases, joy and monsters.

Also known as: Dr. Who 2023

Doctor Who Next Episode

Name:
Joy to the World
Countdown:
6 months
Date:
Wed Dec 25, 2024
Season:
1
Episode:
Special

Previous Episode

Name:
Empire of Death (2)
Date:
Sat Jun 22, 2024
Season:
1
Episode:
8

Show Info

Airs on:
BBC One, UK at 2:00 pm EDT
Runtime:
46 min.
Status:
Running
Rating:
3.28/5 (39 ratings)
More Info:
Forum | Official | IMDb | TheTVDB
Tools:
Subtitles

Trailer

Play Trailer Button

Stats

Premiered:
2023
Episodes:
13
Watchlists:
2,486

Episodes Guide and Summaries

Cast

as The Fifteenth Doctor
as Ruby Sunday
as The Fourteenth Doctor
as Donna Noble
as Mundy Flynn

Popularity

Please login to access advanced features like popularity charts. Takes 10 seconds to register - join now.


If you like Doctor Who (2024) you may also like

Latest comments

Post New
by posted
TheFizza said:
I find it funny y'all seem to be disputing what I see as a tenant of most mainstream SF, since pretty much it's rise to popularly, the subversive nature baked into it and in fact most of the fiction we're talking about here.

For the most part, and often especially the more commercial sort we are most often exposed to, SF has an undercurrent of subversion. Or at least had when began to emerge as part of our fictional library as series like The Twilight Zone and Star Trek gained larger acceptance. A legacy that, from my perspective, series like TNG, Babylon 5, The Tomorrow People, Stargate, Farscape, Fringe and The X-Files and later Dark Matter, 12 Monkeys, The Orville and For All Mankind all continue. Along with drama and speculative discoveries there's usually some trend or trends that are expanded on.

Like when Eleven went to a world where they are perpetually stuck on a highway or when in the 1970s Survivors when every votes to kill the developmentally delayed guy because they think he's a rapists and murderer. But after they do, they find the person who actually did it, is essential personnel thus must compromise their believes to survive. These are all in part morality plays, they are satirizing the world we know by exaggerating something then exploring that exaggeration. It all come together to form the SF soup on which we have come to dine out on.

Andromeda, The 100, Firefly, The Expanse, to name a few, all do this. They challenge perspective, long held ideals, satirize society and encourage diversity... And the most impressive thing about SF is that it can do all this in a safe space. Which is, in no small part, what has always drawn me to SF... since I first read of the Eloi and Morlocks, as a child.

And speaking to my development as a SF fan, the communities I matriculated through held ideals often associated with most of the SF I have mentioned in high esteem, and that is acceptance and inclusion... We are the communities that the weirdos tend to be floating about in wearing capes, kilts and Star Fleet uniforms in everyday life. All thing which, from what it sounds like, many here might labeled as woke.

When I was a kid being taken to SF conventions, by my family, and folks would say things like IDIC they were more than just words, they were aspirational. Just like all the ideals of Federation or of The Doctor or heck even of Dr. Weir and James Holden... as a result, I dare say, all my examples would fall under the definitions of woke... as well they would all likely also be labeled ANTIFA. But whatever we call them or however we each see them, using these hyperbolic terms seems to do nothing more than divide us...

I was under the impression we were all here to celebrate our common appreciation for series!?

Listen if you're not drawn to SF for the same reasons I am, one of which being because I have always seen myself as an outsider, that's cool. You do you. However, it just seems to me, to cry out this is all-of-a-sudden, something it was never... Well that can't help being needlessly divisive and, in some part, disingenuous. Maybe when The Doctor preforms and act of social justice, like when he sabotaged the Company on Pluto, it's not what you came for but it's always been there... Since The Doctor, Ian, Barbara and Susan first meddled in Skaro history, SF has had something to say... Since Lokai and Bele screamed at each other on the bridge of the Enterprise, SF has had something to say.

It may not have been, the gays aren't so bad, but it was something.

Denying it because one does not feel comfortable with what aspects of the status-quo these stories are challenging now when it was right there the whole time seems, to me, to say more about the viewer than the fiction. Tho this is just my opinion.


Amazing post and well said.
by posted
Huh.


some_one said:
the original was mostly "the best we could come up with on a budget of 'random generic costumes and someone's backyard'" episodes.


For some reason, when I wrote that, I kept thinking of Pyramids of Mars, specifically. It's one of the few original episodes I ever watched. It's also where the newly revealed big bad originated.

Kinda puts another point against the complaints about there being magic now: there were always beings in DW canon whose power remained poorly if at all explained. The sisterhood of Karn (originated two stories after PoM) are "witches" from Gallifrey who are "unscientific". That's all that's ever explained. Even in the new(er) show, there are the "words instead of science" witches from that Shakespeare episode, or that thing from "The Satan Pit". One of the other "gods" mentioned in the current episode was the "Trickster" which has also been around for a few years.

Even the Toymaker was already anything but a new character. Putting it into sci-fi terms, this stuff is mostly just "these beings are not from our reality, so they don't have to follow the rules of our reality. They do have to follow the rules of their own reality though, which we are usually able to break - like cheating at games". That's been around as a concept in scifi in general for a long time as well. It doesn't have to be "magic" just because the UNIT people call it that.

Anyway. Episode was reasonably entertaining. Is it the neighbour who is gonna end up being Susan? Also, the Doctor implied to have a granddaughter despite not having had children yet. Except we know that he does, actually?
by posted
SgtSaint said:
I'll put it much more blunt than that:
I don't give a darn who you are, who you date nor do a care what hole you're sticking it in - I just don't care one way or the other: Someone else's orientation doesn't change the cost of my Starbucks so I don't care.
I do care about horrible writing in my shows. I do care about shows being hijacked in a way that 93.4% of the population are getting hammered by a message for the other 5.6% of the population AT THE EXPENSE OF the quality of the show.


I would wager you feel that way because you are among the groups which have traditionally not been under-represented or offensively represented. Those folks who haven't seen themselves or only see negative versions of themselves don't have that luxury to not care.

As for highjacked again that's hyperbolic terminology for essentially the passage of time... to the new generations making and watching series, this is important now. It's like when in the 1970s everyone was upset that there were black folks on TV not just playing small roles. It felt, to a lot to the white folks watching, that they were being forced to accept this when 'that just wasn't the way it was before and it was sooo much of it.' However that's because they were firstly under represented in the past and secondly because media wanted to catch up so quickly they pushed that re-evaluation of the status quo.

As for good or bad shows or writing, art is subjective... or to put it another way "one person's trash is another person's treasure."

SgtSaint said:
B-5 had a great story - a pre-conceived 5 season arc in advance for F! sake.
The Expanse showed people of every orientation and relationship including entire polygomy ship|family. No problem. Great show and nobody ragging on the show for having gays, straights, poly, bi, whatever. Its not until the show, the actual show, takes a back seat to the creator's desire to use the show for their agenda does anyone get {rightfully} upset.


Would it surprise you to know that Delenn from B5 was originally meant to have changed sex when they were in that cocoon?

Originally JMS wanted Delenn to start as a male and become a female then fall in love with a human male. Unfortunately that was one of myriad of changes forced upon him to get Babylon 5 made. Today this would be labeled woke but just by the fact that would have happened in the 90s it sound as though it might get a pass?!

That's not the way the world works, despite even my own wishes, it ever moves forward and one can become either time's convert or time's victim.

As for a show getting a back seat to politics, there's a little series called Star Trek which came out in the 60s and politics was pretty much a piece of every episode. I get it you don't like something challenging your views of how a series should go, and that's a shame because that's the way the wind is blowing. As the X-Men might say, "change or die!"... In other words, either evolve along with the world or you will always be back there lamenting, 'when I was young' to an ever dwindling group.

I'm not trying to say you can't like or dislike something but when you're only complaint is only 5.6% of the population is queer, that's ridiculousness. It's like saying only 40% of Americans are people of color so lets just program for the 60%. And when you're in a capitalist nation it isn't likely that companies like CBS wouldn't want to make money from all quadrants. Not to sound reductive but from my perspective you're yelling into a storm.

That came off harsher than I intended, I think, apologies... Really, I'm just saying if you don't like the story, give me the plot issues that tangle you up, let chat about it. You don't like the 'agenda' then as that has nothing to do with anything, either tune out of the show or educate yourself to maybe understand why this is an important trend to many folks?!

I legit stopped watching Discovery because it wasn't the Trek I wanted to watch... no big deal.

But again this all just my opinion.
by posted
TheFizza said:


I was under the impression we were all here to celebrate our common appreciation for series!?


I think it would be more accurate to say:
> This is a space to discuss the show, good and bad, not just be yes-men and celebrate it blindly even when the scripts are sh!t.

I've tried to be fair through my earlier posts and give credit and even hope when there was reason for it. If they did something good like elements of the land-mine episode I made a point of posting it. If my comments seem to be weighted towards negativity I think that reflects at the balance of good and bad in the show, the writing, the directing and direction.

I'll put it much more blunt than that:
I don't give a darn who you are, who you date nor do a care what hole you're sticking it in - I just don't care one way or the other: Someone else's orientation doesn't change the cost of my Starbucks so I don't care.
I do care about horrible writing in my shows. I do care about shows being hijacked in a way that 93.4% of the population are getting hammered by a message for the other 5.6% of the population AT THE EXPENSE OF the quality of the show.

B-5 had a great story - a pre-conceived 5 season arc in advance for F! sake.
The Expanse showed people of every orientation and relationship including entire polygomy ship|family. No problem. Great show and nobody ragging on the show for having gays, straights, poly, bi, whatever. Its not until the show, the actual show, takes a back seat to the creator's desire to use the show for their agenda does anyone get {rightfully} upset.
by posted
Today's World is so FUCKED!!!!!!!!!!!
by posted
I find it funny y'all seem to be disputing what I see as a tenant of most mainstream SF, since pretty much it's rise to popularly, the subversive nature baked into it and in fact most of the fiction we're talking about here.

For the most part, and often especially the more commercial sort we are most often exposed to, SF has an undercurrent of subversion. Or at least had when began to emerge as part of our fictional library as series like The Twilight Zone and Star Trek gained larger acceptance. A legacy that, from my perspective, series like TNG, Babylon 5, The Tomorrow People, Stargate, Farscape, Fringe and The X-Files and later Dark Matter, 12 Monkeys, The Orville and For All Mankind all continue. Along with drama and speculative discoveries there's usually some trend or trends that are expanded on.

Like when Eleven went to a world where they are perpetually stuck on a highway or when in the 1970s Survivors when every votes to kill the developmentally delayed guy because they think he's a rapists and murderer. But after they do, they find the person who actually did it is essential personnel thus must compromise their believes to survive. These are all in part morality plays, they are satirizing the world we know by exaggerating something then exploring that exaggeration. It all come together to form the SF soup on which we have come to dine out on.

Andromeda, The 100, Firefly, The Expanse, to name a few, all do this. They challenge perspective, long held ideals, satirize society and encourage diversity... And the most impressive thing about SF is that it can do all this in a safe space. Which is, in no small part, what has always drawn me to SF... since I first read of the Eloi and Morlocks, as a child.

And speaking to my development as a SF fan, the communities I matriculated through held ideals, often associated with most of the SF I have mentioned, in high esteem and that is acceptance and inclusion... We are the communities that the weirdos tend to be floating about in wearing capes, kilts and Star Fleet uniforms in everyday life. All thing which, from what it sounds like, many here might labeled as woke.

When I was a kid being taken to SF conventions, by my family, and folks would say things like IDIC they were more than just words, they were aspirational. Just like all the ideals of Federation or of The Doctor or heck even of Dr. Weir and James Holden... as a result, I dare say, all my examples would fall under the definitions of woke... as well they would all likely also be labeled ANTIFA. But whatever we call them or however we each see them, using these hyperbolic terms seems to do nothing more than divide us...

I was under the impression we were all here to celebrate our common appreciation for series!?

Listen if you're not drawn to SF for the same reasons I am, one of which being because I have always seen myself as an outsider, that's cool. You do you. However, it just seems to me, to cry out this is all-of-a-sudden, something it was never... Well that can't help being needlessly divisive and, in some part, disingenuous. Maybe when The Doctor preforms an act of social justice, like when he sabotaged the Company on Pluto, it's not what you came for but it's always been there... Since The Doctor, Ian, Barbara and Susan first meddled in Skaro history, SF has had something to say... Since Lokai and Bele screamed at each other on the bridge of the Enterprise, SF has had something to say.

It may not have been, the gays aren't so bad, but it was something.

Denying it because one does not feel comfortable with what aspects of the status-quo these stories are challenging now when it was right there the whole time seems, to me, to say more about the viewer than the fiction. Tho this is just my opinion.
by posted
Celleron said:
IMO classic Dr. Who wasn't woke at the time. There was no agenda it was just Dr. Who.

It's like comedy. Stuff that was funny in the past is now not allowed.

Yes Dr. Who from the past may have some woke stuff in it, but it wasn't made that way.

The difference is Dr. Who being made now is pushing agendas and being made with ideologies in mind.

Sometimes it can work if done correctly. Look at the latest season of The Boys. It has neddled some woke stuff in but kept to the feeling of the show and still managed to be brilliant.


100%

Another good example is old Star Trek versus new. Trek even in the 1960's was groundbreaking. They did interracial things. They've address orientation and even body gender swaps. Curzan Dax to Jadzia Dax for example. Or Riker falling for a gender neutral from Angle One. But the story was still the story not that being trans was the story.
It was always done as part of the story. And told in a way that it simple *is*. That's it. People are people, now save the ship. The message wasn't the reason for the show. The show wasn't used as a vehicle to promote an agenda being aggressively stressed with every single scene, and the plot is just vaguely there to provide the framework that the producer's message can ride on.

Its the difference between Discovery trying to force it on you - and nobody accepts the show for it - versus something like Walker having a gay brother and that just simply *is*. The audience can tell the difference between a show manufacturing scenes to cause controversy on purpose and a show that has two men or two women living naturally and affectionately in a real-life way.
by posted
IMO classic Dr. Who wasn't woke at the time. There was no agenda it was just Dr. Who.

It's like comedy. Stuff that was funny in the past is now not allowed.

Yes Dr. Who from the past may have some woke stuff in it, but it wasn't made that way.

The difference is Dr. Who being made now is pushing agendas and being made with ideologies in mind.

Sometimes it can work if done correctly. Look at the latest season of The Boys. It has neddled some woke stuff in but kept to the feeling of the show and still managed to be brilliant.
by posted
TheFizza said:
We all have to face it, Doctor Who v3.0 or whatever the hell they've chosen to call it now is Disneyfied, Americanised, woke, inclusive, and a whole bunch of other modern words I can't be bothered to type.

Its target audience won't analyse it like we are and they won't care about the previous 60 years of Whovian lore.

Sad, sad times.


Not for nothin', everyone's entitled to an opinion, but as someone who came in well after the revival began but has watched all of classic Doctor Who, including reconstructions of the lost episodes, I kind of have to agree with this article title:
Doctor Who has always been woke!

I read that article yesterday and I really don't agree with it at all. I've never seen Doctor Who as "woke" until now. It was ground breaking and all that, but not even close to what RTD has done to it.
by posted
graybags said:
We all have to face it, Doctor Who v3.0 or whatever the hell they've chosen to call it now is Disneyfied, Americanised, woke, inclusive, and a whole bunch of other modern words I can't be bothered to type.

Its target audience won't analyse it like we are and they won't care about the previous 60 years of Whovian lore.

Sad, sad times.


Not for nothin', everyone's entitled to an opinion, but as someone who came in well after the revival began but has watched all of classic Doctor Who, including reconstructions of the lost episodes, I kind of have to agree with this article title:
Doctor Who has always been woke!